Charities Regulator launches new guide for Charity Trustees
The Charities Regulator has this month launched a very useful guide in relation to Charity Trustees which can be viewed by clicking on the link below.
The Charities Regulator has this month launched a very useful guide in relation to Charity Trustees which can be viewed by clicking on the link below.
The National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Act 2012 came into force on 29th April 2016. All individuals and organisations working with children and vulnerable persons, or with regular access to or contact with them, should be aware of their obligations under this new legislation.
Who is to be vetted
Under the new legislation, vetting is now mandatory in circumstances where “relevant work or activities” in relation to either children or vulnerable persons, as defined, is carried out by any individual, except in certain limited circumstances. Individuals covered by the legislation include employees, contractors and unpaid volunteers.
“Relevant work or activities” in relation to children includes:
This is not an exhaustive list. Roughly equivalent provisions apply in relation to vulnerable persons, who are defined as people, other than children, who:
which are of such a nature as to restrict the capacity of the person to guard themselves against harm, or that result in their requiring assistance with daily living activities including dressing, eating, walking, washing and bathing.
Database
The Act provides for the establishment of a database system, which is to be operated by the National Vetting Bureau, formerly the Garda Central Vetting Unit. This database will contain registers of:
“Relevant organisation” means any person, including a company, who employs any individual to undertake relevant works or activities, or uses contractors or volunteers to do so (whether or not for commercial or any other consideration). Providers of education or training courses where a necessary part of the placement involves participation in relevant work activities or activities are also included, as are employment agencies, bodies responsible for the regulation of certain professions and representative bodies or those who represent, for the purposes of these vetting procedures, another person, trade, profession or body, organisation or group or other body of persons that undertakes relevant work or activities.
A relevant organisation may not employ or otherwise use individuals to undertake relevant work or activities unless the organisation has received a vetting disclosure from the Bureau in respect of that person. Any person who does so is guilty of an offence, which can lead to a fine of up to €10,000 or imprisonment for up to five years. Arrangements entered into prior to 29th April are excluded from this, but relevant organisations will have to apply to have individuals retrospectively vetted if no vetting has previously taken place.
Employers and those now seeking to contract individuals to undertake work should be careful to ensure that Garda vetting is completed before committing to any employment or contractual arrangements.
Application process
An application for vetting disclosure in respect of an individual must be made by a liaison person, notified to the Vetting Bureau as such, for the relevant organisation in question. Vetting will involve searching for convictions as well as for “specified information”. This is information concerning a finding or allegation of harm to another person that is received by the Bureau from the Gardai or certain organisations and which is of such a nature as to reasonably give rise to a bona fide concern that the person may harm or attempt to harm a child or vulnerable person, incite another person to harm them, or cause them to be harmed or put at risk.
Individuals to be vetted must be notified by the Bureau of any intention to disclose specified information to the relevant organisation, and they can appeal the decision if they so wish.
Those vetted prior to 29th April will be entered into the register of vetted persons.
Compliance inspections
The Bureau will now have compliance officers, who will be permitted to:
In light of these new powers, relevant organisations should make sure that they are sufficiently organised to be able to appropriately deal with an inspection, should one occur, and that everyone who needs to be vetted is.
Our above memo is prepared for general information purposes; it does not purport to provide legal advice. O’Connor solicitors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance on information contained in this post. It is intended to identify general issues on which you may require legal advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a suitably qualified professional when dealing with particular circumstances.
Operational Parts of Act as at 1st September Parts 1 (Prelim. & General), 2 (Registration), 3 (Code & Guidance) and 5 (Misc.) Effective from the 1st September 2015. Critically Part 4 (enforcement) is not yet in operation (likely to come into effect some time after first review of Act in 2016);…
This is a general summary overview of your Role and Duties as an Executor in respect of the administration of the Estate which may be of assistance to you and answer some questions you may have regarding your role.
Your function as an Executor (also called a Legal Personal Representative) is to extract a Grant of Probate to the Estate and to administer the Estate of the deceased.
As Executor your powers and duties date from the date of death of the deceased.
From the date of death the whole Estate devolves or passes to you as Executor. You have very wide powers under general law, apart from any powers given to you under the Will.
Personal Representatives are legally obliged to distribute the Estate of the deceased as soon after death as is reasonably practicable having regard to the nature and the extent of the Estate. However, no action can be taken against an Executor for their failure to do so before the expiration of one year after death (referred to as the Executor’s Year). However, if money is due to any creditor of the Estate, such as Revenue, they can bring proceedings against the Executor without waiting for the expiration of the year as aforesaid.
The duties of an Executor last for life, therefore your obligations as Executor are ongoing.
The following is a simple set of guidelines on the powers and duties of Executors. It is, necessarily, set in very brief and summary form but it is hoped that it will be of assistance to you.
We shall be guiding and advising you in all matters in relation to the administration of the Estate and we will be undertaking all your tasks which we are able to undertake and as per our Letter of Engagement.
We will, of course, be instructing you in all those duties or tasks which you alone can perform and likewise we will fully explain all documents and Declarations which you are required to sign during the course of the administration.
DUTIES OF AN EXECUTOR
INITIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOLLOWING THE DEATH.
The first duty of an Executor is the disposal of the deceased’s body of which the Executor has custody until burial or cremation. Effect should be given to any wishes of the deceased as to the disposal of his or her body (although these are not legally binding). The deceased should be buried in a manner suitable to the Estate, which he or she leaves behind him or her. In practise all of this will have already been arranged and dealt with by the deceased’s family, namely yourselves.
VALUATION AND PROTECTION OF ASSETS.
The next duty is to ascertain the precise value and extent of all of the deceased’s assets. Generally once a bank or financial institution is notified of a death the accounts or investments are automatically frozen and no further activity can take place in relation to the accounts. An Executor may also sell or otherwise dispose of, at his or her discretion, the goods and assets of the Testator before the Grant of Probate issues but this would only really be limited to such matters, if appropriate, as household goods, car or other personal effects. However, certainly in relation to assets such as land or stocks and shares it would be difficult to do so without the Grant of Probate and, in practice, sales of assets will usually only occur after the Grant of Probate issues. The Executor must ensure that the assets of the Estate are properly protected. It follows that there is a duty to insure with a reputable insurance company all assets normally requiring insurance, such as a house or land or other valuable items such as jewellery, house contents, car, etc.
ASCERTAIN LIABILITIES AND BENEFICIARIES.
An Executor must ascertain all outstanding debts, taxes etc. and check that there are no claims outstanding against the Estate. All of the beneficiaries must also be ascertained. An Executor must make enquiries of all beneficiaries in relation to prior gifts or inheritances received by them, where appropriate, and, again, where appropriate to obtain details of the Personal Public Service (PPS) number for each beneficiary. Quite often it will also be necessary for an Executor at this stage to open an Executor’s Bank account, usually with the same bank where the deceased was a customer. This is so all the funds received during the course of the administration can be lodged to the one account. Usually a cheque book is requested so that cheques can be written on the account when the need arises. If necessary, an Executor can also apply for an overdraft facility on the account, should one be required, if there are any urgent debts or bills that have to be paid before the Grant of Probate to the Estate issues and the funds in all of the deceased’s accounts are gathered in.
INLAND REVENUE AFFIDAVIT.
When all enquiries have been made (and these can be numerous and complex) a schedule or list of all the assets and liabilities of the deceased must be prepared. This is an official document known as an Inland Revenue Affidavit and has to be sworn by the Executor along with several other relevant documents and declarations.
EXTRACT RELEVANT GRANT AND COLLECT ASSETS.
When all the relevant papers have been lodged and the relevant Probate and/or tax offices, the Grant of Probate subsequently issues within a period of several weeks. The Executor is then in a position to collect in all the deceased’s assets. It is, at this stage, that assets not being specifically given to named beneficiaries will be sold or retained as appropriate.
PAY EXPENSES AND DEBTS OF THE ESTATE AND DEAL WITH TAXATION MATTERS.
The Executor is obliged to pay the funeral expenses and all other outstanding debts of the deceased. Generally, the funeral bill is the first item paid as it is the only debt that a bank or other financial institution will release funds from a frozen account for. Any other outstanding debts or costs must be paid and discharged at this stage. The Executor is then required to distribute the assets to those entitled, while ensuring that taxes are paid. These taxes include all taxes due by the deceased prior to his or her death, all taxes arising out of the administration of the Estate itself and possibly inheritance tax or capital gains tax arising out of the distribution of the assets to the beneficiaries, depending on the circumstances of the case. In certain circumstances it will be necessary for the beneficiaries themselves to file inheritance tax returns. In general, it will be necessary to make sure that all of the pre-death taxes and Estate taxes and, where appropriate, inheritance tax, are paid and discharged and clearance, where appropriate, obtained from the Revenue Commissioners before the Estate is finally distributed.
ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNT.
Finally, the Executor must furnish an administration account wherein he or she accounts for all monies received and all monies distributed during the administration period and a copy of the administration account is sent to any relevant beneficiaries. It is important that accounts are kept of all income and expenditure and any Executors Account Statements furnished to us as and when received clearly itemising the activity on the account so as to facilitate the expeditious preparation of the
DUTY FOR LIFE.
Duties of the Personal Representative are for life. For example, if any assets are discovered after the distribution of the Estate is complete, it is the duty of the Personal Representative to dispose of that asset as per the Will or on Intestacy as appropriate and deal with any associated tax issues arising therefrom.
RELEVANT POINTS FOR EXECUTORS (FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS).
The following points are of relevance to Executors and are mentioned here as they are the most frequently raised queries asked:
For further information contact Helen McGrath, Partner :
Thompson Reuters publishes Guide to Charity Law in Ireland prepared by John C. O’Connor and Helen McGrath, O’Connor Solicitors.
http://global.practicallaw.com/8-632-9148
Thompson Reuters publish Guide to Charity Law in Ireland prepared by John C. O’Connor and Helen McGrath, O’Connor Solicitors
http://global.practicallaw.com/8-632-9148
On the 5th of September 2016, Part 4 of the Charities Act 2009 will come into operation. Part 4 of the Act provides for the protection of charitable operations, the investigation of Charities’ affairs, and the appointment of Inspectors.
Data privacy at work.
As with all rights, they bring responsibilities; they are not unqualified. The right to privacy is frequently balanced with the exigencies of the common good; it is fair to say that the Courts have typically left both privacy and the exigencies of the common good without rigid parameters. We must default to the great lawyer escape argument on these points; namely that each case must be judged on its merits.
Employees have a right to data privacy in the workplace; this is not an absolute right. It is balanced with other rights such as the right to one’s good name, the right to earn a living and to hold property.
Data privacy issues arise in the workplace from the time that an employee applies for a job; through to the termination of their employment and for a reasonable period after it ends.
Data governance should be actively reviewed by an employer but particularly where there is a change in how an employee may be required to work. For example, if an employer agrees to allow an employee work from home or outside the employer’s premises; data security and privacy of personal data of clients, customers’ and other third parties must be protected. Care must be taken in relation to how an employer will monitor employees working from home; for example, an employer does not have a right to enter an employee’s home without their consent.
Boundaries- What is considered private?
What are reasonable boundaries on data privacy within the workplace?
Peev V Bulgaria 64209/01 [2007] ECHR 6551
The applicant was employed as an expert by the Supreme Cassation Prosecutor’s Office (SCPO) in Bulgaria.
Following the death by suicide of a prosecutor colleague who had alleged that the chief prosecutor and his entourage were harassing and exerting improper pressure on him, the applicant considered resigning and to that end prepared two draft letters which he kept in a drawer of his office desk. However, he eventually decided not to resign and sent a letter to two daily newspapers and the Supreme Judicial Council making a number of grave accusations against the chief prosecutor and urging the authorities to investigate.
One of the newspapers published the letter. On the evening preceding publication, a prosecutor from the SCPO sealed off the applicant’s office and ordered the duty police officer not to allow the applicant to enter the building as he had been dismissed. The applicant was subsequently informed that his resignation letter had been brought to the attention of the chief prosecutor and that his resignation had been accepted. Some days later, the applicant was allowed into the office to collect his personal belongings. He discovered that it had been searched and that certain items, including the draft resignation letters, were missing.
The prosecuting authorities refused to open criminal proceedings. However, the applicant brought a civil action for unlawful dismissal and obtained an order for his reinstatement and an award of compensation. Although he was not in fact reinstated in his former position as the department for which he had worked had been abolished in the interim, he did succeed in obtaining a post with a similar body.
The ECHR concluded that under Article 8 the applicant had a “reasonable expectation of privacy”, if not in respect of his entire office, at least in respect of his desk and filing cabinets. The search of Mr. Peev’s office amounted to interference by a public authority with the applicant’s private life. Under Article 13 (in conjunction with Articles 8 and 10) – the Government had failed to show that any remedies existed in respect of the unlawful search. The domestic proceedings in which the applicant had challenged his dismissal had concentrated on the resignation issue and had not discussed the substance of his freedom-of-expression grievance. The proceedings, therefore, did not amount to an avenue whereby he could vindicate his freedom of expression as such and no other remedy had been suggested by the Government.
Halford V United Kingdom (25 June 1997)
Ms. Halford was appointed to the rank of Assistant Chief Constable with the Merseyside Police. Following a refusal to promote her, Ms. Halford commenced proceedings in the Industrial Tribunal claiming that she had been discriminated against on grounds of sex. Ms. Halford alleges that certain members of the Merseyside Police Authority launched a ‘campaign’ against her in response to her complaint to the Industrial Tribunal. This took the form of leaks to the press and interception of her telephone calls.
She alleged that calls made from her home and her office telephones were intercepted for the purposes of obtaining information to be used against her in the discrimination proceedings. She claimed a breach of Article 8 of the Convention.
The ECHR held that conversations made on the telephones in Ms. Halford’s office at Merseyside Police Headquarters fell within the scope of “private life” and “correspondence” in Article 8 (1).
Data Governance
There is a critical need for all employers to know what they are required to do as data controllers; an employer will hold data in relation to employees but following the DPA obligations the data must be “adequate, relevant and not excessive’?
An employer must accept that the majority of data kept about an employee is data that must be given to the employee upon request under the DPA.
There are some exceptions but those exceptions are limited. This is important if there an employee raises a grievance or there is a disciplinary process underway. A common error by employers is to assume that data really only refers to the personnel file and anything outside that is not covered by the DPA. This is wholly incorrect.
Sensitive data including health information, trade union membership, details of criminal convictions can be processed if it is necessary “for the purpose of exercising or performing any right or obligation which is conferred or imposed by law on the data controller in connection with employment’
It is advisable for an employer to have a clear data retention policy relating to all employees. At a certain time, it will no longer be reasonable to retain a former employee’s data; or for example, the records of a recruitment drive.
Workplace Surveillance
An employer can monitor employees in the workplace provided that any limitation on an employee’s right to privacy is proportionate to the possible damage to the employer’s legitimate interests.
For example, in Case Study 101/2013 the night manager of a hotel used a mobile phone to take photographs of employees who had fallen asleep on duty. The photographs were used in subsequent disciplinary proceedings which the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) found to be against the DPA.
Danniger V SIPTU Labour Court LCR 19328
An objection was raised by SIPTU to the company operating a biometric clocking-in system because it had been brought in following the dismissal of a small number of employees who had been abusing the system. SIPTU argued that this was excessive; the company argued that it was in compliance with the DPA because the copies of the fingerprints were not stored on the system and could not be retrieved from the system. The Labour Court recommended that the system continued for so long as it was transparent and legally operated.
Kopke V Germany 420/07[2010] ECHR 1725
On 5 November 2002 the applicant’s employer dismissed the applicant without notice for theft. The applicant was accused of having manipulated the accounts in the drinks department of the supermarket where she worked and of having taken money (some 100 euros during the period in which she had been covertly filmed by a detective agency on behalf of the employer) from the tills for herself which she had hidden in her clothes.
Ultimately the case reached the ECHR where Ms. Kopke alleged a breach of her Article 8 right to privacy because of unlawful processing of her personal data. The ECHR found that the surveillance had only taken place for two weeks and was not in the immediate vicinity of where Ms. Kopke usually worked; further, it found that there was a balance between her right to privacy and the employer’s legitimate interest in protecting its property rights; in establishing the truth of what was happening in the workplace; to exonerate fellow employees who were not guilty of any offence.
What changes are coming?
The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party published an Action Plan for the implementation of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR Regulation (EU) 2016/679).
The Regulation provides for a new governance model with enhanced roles for Data Protection Commissioners remaining in the EU will be established.
It envisages enhanced co-operation between national DP authorities.
A one-stop shop on enforcement cooperation is envisaged.
Guidance will follow on the following topics;
This post has been prepared for general information purposes. As such it does not purport to provide legal advice. O’Connor Solicitors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance on information contained in this document. It is intended to identify general issues on which you may require legal advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a suitably qualified professional when dealing with particular circumstances.
Benefacts.ie was launched on the 18th May, 2016.
This is a new online database of 18,600 Irish Non-Profits. Benefacts will provide searchable access to regulatory, financial and governance data about the non-profit sector which employs almost 108,000 and turns over more than €7bn in annual revenues. The Benefacts database includes all registered charities and thousands of other NGOs including education institutions, social enterprises and sports and professional bodies. Benefacts works in co-operation with a variety of regulators to acquire data currently in the public domain for inclusion in the database, providing access to a broad range of information on the Irish non-profit sector in one easy to access location.
For further information see benefacts.ie.
As a society, we need to have confidence in the companies that we do business with. We want to know that they will be run in a responsible way by their directors and officers.
The Companies Act 2014 (“the Act”), for the first time codifies, the duties and obligations of company directors and officers. Part 4 addresses corporate governance; Part 5 outlines the duties of directors and other officers; Part 14 deals with compliance and enforcement; disqualification and restriction of directors.
Under Section 223, directors are now required to sign the following declaration;
“I acknowledge that, as a director, I have legal duties and obligations imposed by the Companies Act, other statutes and at common law”.
Directors have what is known as a “fiduciary duty” to the company. This means that the director must act solely for the benefit of the company.
The Act requires directors to take into account the interests of employees. It also requires directors to consider the interests of members/shareholders. However, their ultimate duty is to the company.
Section 228 includes the following requirements of directors:
■ act in good faith; and in the best interests of the company;
■ act honestly and responsibly in relation to the conduct of the affairs of the company;
■ act in accordance with the company’s constitution and exercise his or her powers only for the purposes allowed by law;
■ not to benefit from or use the company’s property, information or opportunities for his or her own or anyone else’s benefit unless the company’s constitution permits it or a resolution is passed in general meeting;
■ not to agree to restrict the director’s power to exercise an independent judgment unless this is expressly permitted by the company’s constitution;
■ not to agree to restrict the director’s power to exercise an independent judgment unless this is expressly permitted by the company’s constitution;
■ to avoid any conflict between the director’s duties to the company and the director’s other interests unless the director is released from his or her duty to the company in relation to the matter concerned;
■ to exercise the care, skill and diligence which would be reasonably expected of a person in the same position with similar knowledge and experience as a director. A director may be held liable for any loss resulting from their negligent behaviour
A director may be held liable for any loss resulting from their negligent behaviour and required to indemnify the company for any such loss of damage.
Section 235 of the Act states that the company cannot indemnify its directors and officers from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty and/or breach of trust; it can purchase insurance to cover them for allegations of wrongful acts such as the above.
It is prudent for all company directors and officers to ensure that prior to taking office; the company has directors and officers insurance cover in place. In the absence of same, a director faces unlimited personal liability for decisions taken in the role.
A directors and officers policy (“D&O”) is typically divided into Side A cover which relates to protection for directors and officers and their personal assets against liability that the company cannot indemnify them for; Side B which relates to the company balance sheet and liability that the company can indemnify directors for; Side C typically relates to company liability subject to a stated limit.
Given the duties and obligations of directors and officers, it is prudent to ensure that prior to taking up an office; the company has purchased an adequate D&O policy. This can support directors in their role by lessening the exposure of their personal assets when defending allegations of wrongful acts.
Our above memo is prepared for general information purposes; it does not purport to provide legal advice. O’Connor solicitors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance on information contained in this post. It is intended to identify general issues on which you may require legal advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a suitably qualified professional when dealing with particular circumstances.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
No description